Warm-up:

1. Respond to the following question in writing:

   The Gideon v. Wainwright decision was a victory for the rights of criminal defendants in felony cases. If you could expand the decision further, how would you do so?

2. Discuss responses.

Process:

1. Read the abstract of In re Gault.

2. Answer the questions that follow:
   1. How are the Gideon and Gault cases similar?

   2. How do they differ?

   3. What was the decision in Gault?

3. Read the abstract of Argersinger v. Hamlin.

4. Answer the questions that follow:
   1. How are the Gideon and Argersinger cases similar?

   2. How do they differ?

   3. What was the decision in Argersinger?

Conclusion:

In a well-written paragraph, respond to the questions that follow: What impact do you think the decisions in Gault and Argersinger have had on criminal justice in the United States? Do you agree or disagree with these decisions?

Follow-up:

The federal and state governments are NOT required to provide the parties with a free attorney in civil cases. Why is this permissible?

back to top

Activities
    The Case

•	Document Analysis
•	What Does the Sixth Amendment Mean? To Whom Does It Apply?
•	Does a Lawyer Really Make a Difference In a Trial?
•	Political Cartoon Analysis
•	The Evolution of a Decision

back to top

    After the Case

•	WebQuest on How to Provide Counsel to Indigent Defendants
•	Expanding Criminal Rights: In re Gault and Argersinger v. Hamlin
	back to top    Additional    Resources
•	Gideon Reviewed: The State of the Nation 40 Years Later
•	Gideon at Forty: The Promise Comes with a Price Tag
•	Fixing a System that Denies Justice to the Poor

back to top