Korematsu v. United States
Background Summary and Questions  


After Pearl Harbor was bombed in December 1941, the American military became concerned about an attack from the Japanese on the mainland of the United States.  There were many people of Japanese descent living on the West Coast at the time and the American government was worried that they might aid the enemy.  However, at the time there was no proven case of espionage or sabotage on the part of Japanese or Japanese Americans in the United States.

Nonetheless, in February 1942, General DeWitt, the commanding officer of the Western Defense Command, recommended that “Japanese and other subversive persons” be removed from the West Coast.  President Franklin D. Roosevelt soon signed Executive order 9066, which allowed military authorities to enact curfews, forbid people from certain areas, and to move them to new areas.  Congress then passed a law imposing penalties for people who ignored these orders.  Many Japanese and Japanese Americans on the West Coast were moved to camps farther inland.  This was called internment.  Japanese Americans were forced to sell their homes and personal belongings and to move to the camps.  They were required to live in barracks which did not having running water or cooking facilities. 

Fred Korematsu was born in America of Japanese parents.  He tried to serve in the United States military, but was rejected for poor health.  When Japanese internment began in California, Korematsu moved to another town.  He also had some facial surgery and claimed to be Mexican-American.  He was later arrested and convicted of violating an order that banned people of Japanese descent from the area of San Leandro, California.
Korematsu challenged his conviction in the courts.  He said that Congress, the President, and the military authorities didn’t have the power to issue the relocation orders.  He also said that because the order only applied to people of Japanese descent, the government was discriminating against him on the basis of race. 
The government argued that the evacuation of all Japanese Americans was necessary to protect the country because there was evidence that some were working for the Japanese government.  The government said that because there was no way to tell the loyal from the disloyal, all Japanese Americans had to be treated as though they were disloyal.
The federal appeals court agreed with the government.  Korematsu appealed this decision and the case came before the U.S. Supreme Court.


Questions to Consider:

  1. Under which sections of the U.S. Constitution could the President and Congress have the power to issue the executive order and penalties discussed above?

 

  1. The United States was also at war with Germany and Italy.  Yet people of German and Italian descent were not gathered up for internment as a group like the Japanese.  Why do you suppose the Japanese were treated this way?
  1. In times of war, governments often must balance the needs of national security with the civil rights of its citizens.  In your opinion, did the internment order find the right balance between these competing values?



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Resources

About landmarkcases.org
 
Teaching Recommendations
Based on Your Time

 
Background Summary
and Questions

• • •
Reading Level
• •
Reading Level
 •
Reading Level
 
Diagram of How the Case Moved Through the Court System
Key Excerpts from the Majority Opinion
Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion
Full Text of the Majority Opinion

back to top

Activities
    The Case

Classifying Arguments

Primary Documents: Executive Order 9066

A Question of Loyalty
Presidential Powers in Wartime: Standard level activity
Presidential Powers in Wartime: AP level activity
Cartoon Analysis

back to top

    After the Case

Did the Court Err in Korematsu
Cases in the War Against Terrorism
Fred Korematsu's Obituary


back to top

 
Additional Resources
Densho: the Japanese American Legacy
Exploring the Japanese American Internment
Virtual Museum of San Francisco: Internment of the Japanese

back to top

Back to top


  FindLaw  
 

LEGAL WEB AND DATABASE SEARCH