Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
More on the Equal = Same Dillemma

"No State shall … deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

—Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

When you first read this excerpt from the Fourteenth Amendment, its meaning seems clear. The states (as well as the federal government by implication) must treat people equally. It is easy to assume that we all know what the term "equal" means, but sometimes what it means to be equal is not so clear. People have different, and legitimate, understandings of what it means to be equal. This helps us understand why the Supreme Court of the United States has had so much trouble interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment.

For example, we all expect our doctors to treat everyone equally. Imagine that you went to the doctor complaining of a headache. After the doctor examined you, she determined that you had a brain tumor, and she advises that you take two aspirin and get some bed rest. You are shocked. Shouldn't you have an operation or some other treatment to get rid of the tumor? "No," the doctor replies, because she prescribes aspirin to all of her headache patients. After all she must treat everyone equally, right?

Here's another example. There are probably students with disabilities in your school. Most schools have special accommodations like ramps at the entrance, larger bathroom stalls for wheelchairs, and special education teachers. This means that some students are treated differently from others. But the different treatment helps those students get an equal education.

These are two examples of how different treatment can lead to equal treatment. However, no one would deny that sometimes treating people equally means treating them exactly the same. For instance, if two people, and man and a woman applied for a job as a shoe sales person, we would expect that they would be given the same chance for the job.

You can probably see how conflicting ideas about what it means to treat people equally could present problems for a court. When the Supreme Court of the United States must decide cases where people who have been treated differently sue claiming a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment, the justices must determine whether the different treatment leads to inequality. This is not an easy task.

Resources
About landmarkcases.org
 
Teaching Recommendations
Based on Your Time

 
Background Summary
and Questions

• • •
Reading Level
• •
Reading Level
 •
Reading Level
Diagram of How the Case Moved Through the Court System
 
Key Excerpts from the Majority Opinion
 
Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion
  
Full Text of the Majority Opinion

back to top

Activities
    The Case
Reinforcing the Case Facts With a Cartoon

Does Treating People Equally Mean Treating Them the Same?
 

Fourteenth Amendment vs.
Tenth Amendment:
Federalism

 

Interpreting the Constitution
 

back to top

    After the Case
The Impact of the Case: Separate But Equal
 

How a Dissent Can Presage a Ruling
 

Case Study of Integration -- Little Rock
 

back to top

Back to top


  FindLaw  
 

LEGAL WEB AND DATABASE SEARCH